DXOMARK video evaluation is controversial again

  • In recent years, https://www.xteamsshop.com/seattle-seahawks.htmlwith the development of self-developed imaging algorithms by major mobile phone manufacturers and the continuous controversy over the content of DXO's own evaluation, the influence of DXOMARK image evaluation in the mobile phone industry has gradually declined, and many manufacturers who were keen to send DXO for testing have withdrawn. , https://www.zteamsshop.com/los-angeles-lakers/shaquille-o-neal.htmlthe influence of DXOMARK image evaluation, and even the authenticity of the score are challenged. Recently, DXOMARK announced the image score of the Xiaomi Mi 12S Ultra purchased at its own expense, and there was controversy again. In the end, DXOMARK gave Xiaomi 12S Ultra a test score of 144 points for photo shooting, 96 points for zoom, 113 points for video, and a total score of 138 points, ranking fifth in this list. Lower than the Huawei P50 Pro, the Huawei Mate 40 Pro+, which has been released for nearly two years, and the previous-generation imaging flagship 11Ultra. For the shortcomings of Xiaomi Mi 12S Ultra shooting, DXOMARK said that there are some unstable exposure and HDR rendering, telephoto focus, noise in HDR scenes, low backlight contrast, lack of HDR in preview mode, etc. However, https://www.yteamsshop.com/boston-bruins/patrice-bergeron.htmlaccording to the actual experience of many bloggers and the comparison of shooting, the current mainstream view is that the image shooting of Xiaomi 12S Ultra is significantly improved compared with the previous generation. This is also the most controversial part of the DXO list at present. It is worth noting that this is not the first time that DXO has seen a situation where the replacement product is inferior and the image performance of the previous generation product is inferior. https://www.uteamsshop.com/chicago-blackhawks/jonathan-toews.htmlThe Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra once had a lower DXO score than the Galaxy S20 Ultra.